Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/22256
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
dc.creatorSzeto, GP-
dc.creatorStraker, LM-
dc.creatorO'Sullivan, PB-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-14T01:31:49Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-14T01:31:49Z-
dc.identifier.issn0004-9514-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/22256-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAustralian Physiotherapy Assocen_US
dc.subjectComputersen_US
dc.subjectElectromyographyen_US
dc.subjectNeck painen_US
dc.subjectPhysiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectWord processingen_US
dc.titleDuring computing tasks symptomatic female office workers demonstrate a trend towards higher cervical postural muscle load than asymptomatic office workers : an experimental studyen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage257-
dc.identifier.epage262-
dc.identifier.volume55-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dcterms.abstractQuestions: Do symptomatic female office workers perform computing tasks with higher cervical postural muscle loads (in terms of higher amplitudes and less muscular rest) and more discomfort compared with asymptomatic individuals? Are these differences in postural muscle loads consistent across bilateral (typing) and unilateral (mousing) conditions? Design: an experimental case-control study. Participants: 18 symptomatic female office workers and 21 asymptomatic female office workers. Intervention: Three conditions (typing, mousing, and type-and-mouse) were performed in random order. Outcome measures: Muscle load was measured as median amplitude and gap frequency using surface EMG of bilateral cervical erector spinae and upper trapezius. Discomfort was measured using a numerical rating scale. Results: The case group demonstrated 4.3% (95% CI 0.1 to 8.4) higher amplitude during typing and 3.5% (95% CI 0.1 to 6.9) higher amplitude during type-and-mouse in the right cervical erector spinae compared with the control group. There was a similar difference between groups in the left cervical erector spinae which also demonstrated a 1.2 gaps/min (95% CI -2.3 to 0.0) lower frequency during typing. The case group had significantly higher discomfort during all conditions compared with the control group. The case group demonstrated higher median amplitudes and lower gap frequencies than the control group during bilateral conditions (typing and type-and-mouse) compared with unilateral conditions (mousing) for both muscle groups. Conclusion: There was increased amplitude and decreased muscular rest in the cervical erector spinae of office workers performing typing and mousing tasks. These findings may represent a mechanism underlying computer-related musculoskeletal disorders.-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAustralian journal of physiotherapy, 2009, v. 55, no. 4, p. 257-262-
dcterms.isPartOfAustralian Journal of Physiotherapy-
dcterms.issued2009-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000276103200005-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-72549098794-
dc.identifier.pmid19929768-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr50104-
dc.description.ros2009-2010 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Aug 28, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Oct 19, 2020

Page view(s)

150
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Oct 18, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.