Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Drivers for adopting public private partnerships-empirical comparison between China and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Authors: Chan, APC 
Lam, PTI 
Chan, DWM 
Cheung, E
Ke, Y
Keywords: China
Hong Kong
Private Sector
Issue Date: 2009
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Source: Journal of construction engineering and management, 2009, v. 135, no. 11, p. 1115-1124 How to cite?
Journal: Journal of construction engineering and management 
Abstract: The private sector has long been involved in delivering public sector projects, whether its role has been as a partner or just as a contractor for the government. Over recent years the interest in adopting public private partnerships (PPPs) has increased internationally. Many research studies have presented positive reasons for the governments and the private sector to welcome this form of procurement, rather than continue adopting the traditional options. This paper aims to explore and compare the key drivers for adopting PPP in China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (referred to as Hong Kong from here onwards). An empirical questionnaire survey was conducted in both of these administrative systems and survey respondents were invited to rate their perceptions on the importance of 15 different drivers identified. Eighty-seven completed survey questionnaires were returned for analysis. The findings indicated that respondents from China rated economy-related drivers higher, whereas Hong Kong respondents tended to rate efficiency-related drivers higher. China's demand for more public infrastructure and services has imposed great pressure on the government's budget, and therefore economic drivers were rated higher. On the other hand, with adequate financial reserve in hand and budget surplus over recent years, Hong Kong has tended to prefer paying for projects upfront, and hence efficiency was regarded more significantly. Among the 15 drivers, both of the respondents from China and Hong Kong selected, "provide an integrated solution (for public infrastructure/services)" and "solve the problem of public sector budget restraint" to be within the top three drivers. Despite the general agreement on the ranking pattern, the results of independent two-sample t-test showed that China and Hong Kong shared very different views on the driver "reduce the total project cost." This driver was ranked rather high by the mainland Chinese respondents, but much lower by the Hong Kong respondents. This finding can be construed that economic drivers are in general rated higher in China as compared to that in Hong Kong.
ISSN: 0733-9364
EISSN: 1943-7862
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000088
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record


Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Aug 11, 2018


Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Aug 17, 2018

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Aug 20, 2018

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.