Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/19708
Title: Customer-driven vs. retailer-driven search : channel performance and implications
Authors: Jiang, L 
Anupindi, R
Keywords: Multilocation system
Competition
Search
Inventory
Pricing
Information systems
Issue Date: 2010
Publisher: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
Source: Manufacturing and service operations management, 2010, v. 12, no. 1, p. 102-119 How to cite?
Journal: Manufacturing and service operations management 
Abstract: A common phenomenon that occurs in any decentralized multilocation system is stock imbalance, whereby some locations have unsatisfied demands while others are overstocked. The system can be rebalanced by using a search process that is driven by either the customers or the retailers. In a customer-driven search (CDS), the customer with unmet demand may search for the product at another location and, if it is available, complete the purchase. In a retailer-driven search (RDS), the retailer with unsatisfied demand searches for product and schedules transshipment to fulfill the unmet demand at his location. Of course, the revenues generated through search in RDS need to be shared between the parties according to a transfer pricing scheme. In a setting of one manufacturer and two retailers with price-dependent and random demand, we explore the impact of the search method and the transfer price scheme used on the preferences of the manufacturer, the retailers, and the customers. With endogenous retail prices, we find that both the manufacturer and the retailers prefer RDS over CDS when they can design the transfer pricing scheme in RDS. Interestingly, neither party prefers the fixed transfer pricing scheme commonly assumed in the literature. Instead, transfer price that is proportional to the price of the retailer with either excess stock or excess demand is preferred. However, although both parties favor an RDS system when they can design the transfer pricing scheme in RDS, they may prefer RDS or CDS when the other party designs the RDS. Thus, the interests of the manufacturer and the retailers are rarely aligned. Customers benefit from a lower price in an RDS but at the expense of lower availability (as measured by the level of safety stock).
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/19708
ISSN: 1523-4614
EISSN: 1526-5498
DOI: 10.1287/msom.1090.0258
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
Citations as of Apr 11, 2016

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Jul 19, 2017

Page view(s)

35
Last Week
1
Last month
Checked on Jul 9, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.