Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/18443
Title: Comparison of four geodetic network densification solutions
Authors: Fok, HS
Iz, BH 
Schaffrin, B
Issue Date: 2009
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Source: Survey review, 2009, v. 41, no. 311, p. 44-56 How to cite?
Journal: Survey review 
Abstract: Geodetic surveying practices require the establishment of new control stations that are tied to higher order stations with known coordinates (reference control stations – fiducial stations), an activity known as densification. The coordinates of the newly established control stations are adjusted together with the coordinates of the reference control stations which are required to remain invariant along with their variance-covariance matrices (i.e. they are reproduced). In this study, we compare the performance of four different approaches that can be used to achieve this end for their optimality and sensitivity against potential systematic effects in the reference control station coordinates using a GPS network densification example.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/18443
ISSN: 0039-6265
EISSN: 1752-2706
DOI: 10.1179/003962608X389997
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Dec 4, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Dec 8, 2017

Page view(s)

60
Last Week
3
Last month
Checked on Dec 10, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.