Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/18221
Title: Comparative testing of PMF and CFA models
Authors: Qin, Y
Oduyemi, K
Chan, LY
Keywords: Convenient factor analysis
Positive matrix factorization
Respirable suspended particulate
Source identification
Issue Date: 2002
Publisher: Elsevier Science Bv
Source: Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems, 2002, v. 61, no. 1-2, p. 75-87 How to cite?
Journal: Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 
Abstract: Positive matrix factorization (PMF) and convenient factor analysis (CFA) models have been tested using a large aerosol database measured in Hong Kong. As many as possible chemical components (good elements or so-called weak elements) [Atmos. Environ. 33 (1999) 2169] were selected to compose as large as possible a database. Error estimates and enforced rotation techniques were used in the PMF model trial. These important aspects were not included in a recently published work [Atmos. Environ. 33 (1999) 2169]. The test results of the two models mentioned above were assessed qualitatively by analyzing factor characteristics, and quantitatively by comparing factor mass profiles. CFA model has been shown to be a convenient tool for aerosol source identification and can qualitatively treat the elements that can serve as source tracers as well as PMF model does. PMF model provides expert tool for the identification of aerosol sources and source contribution estimation. It can treat the chemical components from various sources by apportioning these chemical components among the factors more reasonably than CFA model can. Quantitatively, the factor mass profiles produced by a PMF model are better at describing the source structure than those derived by a CFA model.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/18221
ISSN: 0169-7439
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00175-7
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

41
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Sep 23, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

38
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Sep 21, 2017

Page view(s)

29
Last Week
0
Last month
Checked on Sep 24, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.