Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Upper bound solution for ultimate bearing capacity with a modified Hoek-Brown failure criterion
Authors: Yang, XL
Yin, JH 
Keywords: Bearing capacity
Modified Hoek-Brown criterion
Rock masses
Upper bound
Issue Date: 2005
Publisher: Pergamon Press
Source: International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences, 2005, v. 42, no. 4, p. 550-560 How to cite?
Journal: International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences 
Abstract: Conventional calculations of ultimate bearing capacity are formulated in terms of a linear Mohr-Coulomb (MC) failure criterion. However, experimental data shows that the strength envelops of almost all types of rocks are nonlinear over the wide range of normal stresses. In this paper, the strength envelope of rock masses is considered to follow a modified Hoek-Brown failure criterion that is a nonlinear failure criterion. Two different kinds of techniques are used to develop the ultimate bearing capacity in the framework of limit analysis in plasticity. The first technique is the generalized tangential technique proposed by the authors. Based on a multi-wedge translation failure mechanism, a generalized tangential technique is used to formulate the bearing capacity problem as a classical optimization problem where the objective function, which is to be minimized with respects to the parameters of failure mechanism and the location of tangency point, corresponds to the dissipated power. The minimum solution is obtained by optimization. Using the technique, the effects of rock weight under the base of the footing and surcharge load can be considered. The second technique, "tangential" line technique, was originally used to analyze slope stability with a nonlinear failure criterion. In order to assess the validity of the proposed method, the "tangential" line technique is extended to evaluate the bearing capacity factor with the nonlinear failure criterion, where the effects of self-weight and surcharge load on the bearing capacity cannot considered. The second technique, however, has to utilize the previously calculated ultimate bearing capacity factor with a linear MC failure criterion. Numerical results are compared and presented for practical use in rock engineering.
ISSN: 1365-1609
EISSN: 1873-4545
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.03.002
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record


Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Apr 10, 2018


Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Apr 17, 2018

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Apr 15, 2018

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.