Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Bracketing in phenomenology : only undertaken in the data collection and analysis process?
Authors: Chan, ZCY 
Fung, YL
Chien, WT 
Keywords: Analysis process
Data collection
Issue Date: 2013
Source: Qualitative report, 2013, v. 18, no. 30 How to cite?
Journal: Qualitative Report 
Abstract: Our aim with this article is to demonstrate how the researchers use bracketing as a method of demonstrating the validity after initiating a phenomenological study. Although bracketing is a method of demonstrating the validity of the data collection and analysis process in most phenomenological studies, how the researchers use them in practice is rarely demonstrated explicitly. We collected data through our experiences in preparing a phenomenological research study. We suggest that the concept of bracketing should be adopted upon initiating the research proposal and not merely in the data collection and analysis process. We propose four strategies for doing bracketing that are guided by the thinking activity of reflexivity: mentality assessment and preparation before deciding the research paradigm, deciding the scope of the literature review according to the prevailing gate-keeping policy, planning for data collection using semi-structured interviews guided by open-ended questions, and planning for data analysis using Colaizzi's method. Our proposition highlights that thorough preparation for doing bracketing is essential before entering the data collection and analysis process in phenomenology, because they are sequentially related.
ISSN: 1052-0147
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record


Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Mar 17, 2018

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Mar 18, 2018

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.