Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Comparison of timber and metal formwork systems
Authors: Yip, R
Poon, CS 
Keywords: Economics & finance
Waste management & disposal
Temporary works
Issue Date: 2008
Publisher: Thomas Telford
Source: Proceedings of the ice-waste and resource management, 2008, v. 161, no. 1, p. 29-36 How to cite?
Journal: Proceedings of the ICE-Waste and Resource Management 
Abstract: Formwork is one of the most important temporary works for reinforced-concrete superstructures in building projects. The use of traditional timber formwork has dominated the construction industry in Hong Kong for many years. Now, however, low-waste technologies for superstructure construction are becoming more common. The study reported here compares the advantages and disadvantages of using traditional timber formwork and a large panel steel formwork system integrated with precast concrete semi-slab (composite formwork system) in superstructure construction in Hong Kong. The study compares these two different formwork systems used in two identically designed school projects in Hong Kong. The comparisons are focused on construction cost, time required for completion of work and construction waste generation. By conducting a detailed cost comparison, this paper shows that, despite the fact that the composite formwork system is able to produce less construction waste, the traditional timber formwork system is still more favourable economically. However, if the composite formwork could be reused in other standard school projects after completion of the project, economic advantages would be realised.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Nov 11, 2018

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.