Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/15312
Title: Evaluation for the conservation of historic buildings : differences between the laymen, professionals and policy makers
Authors: Yung, EHK 
Chan, EHW 
Keywords: Building conservation
China
Evaluation
Historic buildings
Laymen
Policy makers
Professionals
Strategic evaluation
Issue Date: 2013
Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Source: Facilities, 2013, v. 31, no. 41984, p. 542-564 How to cite?
Journal: Facilities 
Abstract: Purpose: This study aims to examine whether there are significant differences between laymen's, professionals' and policy makers' evaluations of the conservation of historic buildings. Design/methodology/approach: The research began with interview surveys using a sample of laymen and professionals in the built environment and it examined their evaluation standards of a sample of 25 historic buildings in Hong Kong. The research also used the controversial Queen's Pier case to examine the extent to which different preferences of conservation between laymen and professionals and policy makers has led to its conservation campaign. Findings: The results indicate that laymen and professional groups evaluate historic buildings based on slightly different criteria. The research also reveals that their preference for what is worth conserving is different from policy makers. The debate over the conservation of the Queen's Pier illustrates a wide range of issues other than differences of preference that may have stimulated the campaign. Research limitations/implications: The sample size of the respondents and the sample buildings are limited due to manpower resource and funding. Further study can expand the sampling size. Originality/value: The study is original research which illustrates the differences between laymen's, professionals' and policy makers' evaluation criteria and assessment of historic buildings. It recommends a greater understanding of all stakeholders' interests in heritage conservation and the incorporation of the public's view into legislative and administrative procedures in designating and listing historic buildings.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/15312
ISSN: 0263-2772
EISSN: 1758-7131
DOI: 10.1108/F-03-2012-0023
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Sep 23, 2017

Page view(s)

40
Last Week
3
Last month
Checked on Sep 18, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.