Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/14814
Title: Screening for diabetic retinopathy with or without a copayment in a randomized controlled trial: Influence of the inverse care law
Authors: Lian, JX
McGhee, SM
Gangwani, RA
Hedley, AJ
Lam, CLK
Yap, MKH 
Lai, WW
Chu, DWS
Wong, DSH
Issue Date: 2013
Source: Ophthalmology, 2013, v. 120, no. 6, p. 1247-1253 How to cite?
Journal: Ophthalmology 
Abstract: Objective: To examine whether the inverse care law operates in a screening program for diabetic retinopathy (DR) based on fee for service in Hong Kong. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Participants: All those with type 1 or 2 diabetes from 2 clinics were recruited. Intervention: Diabetic retinopathy screening with a small copayment versus free access in a publicly funded family medicine service. Main Outcome Measures: Uptake of screening and severity of DR detected. Association between these outcome variables and independent variables were determined using multivariate logistic regression models and reported as odds ratios (ORs). Results: After randomization, 1387 subjects in the free group and 1379 subjects in the pay group were eligible for screening, and 94.9% (1316/1387) and 92.6% (1277/1379), respectively, agreed to participate in the study. The offer of screening was accepted by 94.8% (1247/1316) in the free group and 91.2% (1164/1277) in the pay group, and the final uptake ratios were 88.5% (1165/1316) and 82.4% (1052/1277), respectively (Pearson chi = 19.74, P<0.001). Being in the pay group was associated with a lower uptake of screening than being in the free group (OR, 0.59; confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.74) and a lower detection rate of DR (OR, 0.73; CI, 0.60-0.90) after adjustment for potential confounding factors. Subjects with higher socioeconomic status were more likely to attend screening and had a lower prevalence of DR detected. Conclusions: The inverse care law seems to operate in a preventive intervention when a relatively small copayment is applied. There is a case for making effective preventive services free of charge. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/14814
ISSN: 0161-6420
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.024
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Aug 20, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Aug 21, 2017

Page view(s)

47
Last Week
5
Last month
Checked on Aug 21, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.