Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/14772
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Services Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorLai, JHKen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-13T10:33:23Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-13T10:33:23Z-
dc.identifier.issn0301-4215en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/14772-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2014. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectBuilding stakeholdersen_US
dc.subjectGreenhouse gasen_US
dc.subjectMandatory reportingen_US
dc.titleMandatory reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from buildings : stakeholders' opinions in Hong Kongen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage278en_US
dc.identifier.epage288en_US
dc.identifier.volume75en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enpol.2014.10.004en_US
dcterms.abstractMandatory reporting of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which is intended to help combat global warming, has been increasingly implemented across the world. For buildings in Hong Kong, however, GHG reporting remains entirely voluntary even though the government has issued a set of guidelines to facilitate building owners and managers to quantify GHG emissions from buildings. Aimed at understanding stakeholders' opinions on whether, and to what extent, the GHG reporting should be made mandatory, a study involving a questionnaire survey was carried out. Analysis of the opinions revealed that the majority supported making the reporting mandatory for office, hotel/hostel, and industrial buildings. Generally more support was received from those who were highly experienced, employees of non-government public organisations, academics/researchers, or qualified carbon/energy auditors. Their agreement on requiring reporting of activities under scopes 1 and 2 of the GHG Protocol was stronger than that for the scope 3 activities. Reporting of paper waste disposal attracted the weakest support. The reasons for not supporting the mandatory policy, including resource constraint and financial and knowledge barriers that confront the stakeholders, were identified. The findings of this study serve as reference for energy policy makers.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEnergy policy, Dec. 2014, v. 75, p. 278-288en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEnergy policyen_US
dcterms.issued2014-12-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84921927030-
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2014004905-
dc.description.ros2014-2015 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0751-n05, a0861-n23en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
34-Manuscript_EngPol_May2014.pdfPre-Published version885.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

151
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

Downloads

170
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.