Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/1301
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorWu, CL-
dc.creatorChau, KW-
dc.creatorLi, YS-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:24:17Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:24:17Z-
dc.identifier.issn0022-1694-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/1301-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsJournal of Hydrology © 2009 Elsevier B.V. The journal web site is located at http://www.sciencedirect.com.en_US
dc.subjectDaily flows predictionen_US
dc.subjectArtificial neural networken_US
dc.subjectLagged predictionen_US
dc.subjectMoving averageen_US
dc.subjectSingular spectral analysisen_US
dc.subjectWavelet multi-resolution analysisen_US
dc.titleMethods to improve neural network performance in daily flows predictionen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: K. W. Chauen_US
dc.identifier.spage80-
dc.identifier.epage93-
dc.identifier.volume372-
dc.identifier.issue1-4-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.038-
dcterms.abstractIn this paper, three data-preprocessing techniques, moving average (MA), singular spectrum analysis (SSA), and wavelet multi-resolution analysis (WMRA), were coupled with artificial neural network (ANN) to improve the estimate of daily flows. Six models, including the original ANN model without data preprocessing, were set up and evaluated. Five new models were ANN-MA, ANN-SSA1, ANN-SSA2, ANN-WMRA1, and ANN-WMRA2. The ANN-MA was derived from the raw ANN model combined with the MA. The ANN-SSA1, ANN-SSA2, ANN-WMRA1 and ANN-WMRA2 were generated by using the original ANN model coupled with SSA and WMRA in terms of two different means. Two daily flow series from different watersheds in China (Lushui and Daning) were used in six models for three prediction horizons (i.e., 1-, 2-, and 3-day-ahead forecast). The poor performance on ANN forecast models was mainly due to the existence of the lagged prediction. The ANN-MA, among six models, performed best and eradicated the lag effect. The performances from the ANN-SSA1 and ANN-SSA2 were similar, and the performances from the ANN-WMRA1 and ANN-WMRA2 were also similar. However, the models based on the SSA presented better performance than the models based on the WMRA at all forecast horizons, which meant that the SSA is more effective than the WMRA in improving the ANN performance in the current study. Based on an overall consideration including the model performance and the complexity of modeling, the ANN-MA model was optimal, then the ANN model coupled with SSA, and finally the ANN model coupled with WMRA.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of hydrology, 15 June 2009, v. 372, no. 1-4, p. 80-93-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of hydrology-
dcterms.issued2009-06-15-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000267334800009-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-65749118118-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr45048-
dc.description.ros2009-2010 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JH7.pdfPre-published version668.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

163
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

Downloads

556
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

277
Last Week
1
Last month
2
Citations as of Apr 12, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

260
Last Week
3
Last month
7
Citations as of Apr 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.