Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Jury instructions in Hong Kong: A Gricean perspective
Authors: Cheng, L
Cheng, W 
Li, J
Keywords: Cooperative
Gricean maxims
Hong Kong
Interpretative force
Jury instructions
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Equinox Publishing Ltd
Source: International journal of speech, language and the law, 2015, v. 22, no. 1, p. 35-55 How to cite?
Journal: International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 
Abstract: Most previous studies on jury instructions have been confined to legalese such as the lexical and syntactic features of jury instructions. This study, drawing on reported cases on jury instructions from the Hong Kong judiciary, aims to examine jury instructions in Hong Kong to better explore how jury instructions are given in Hong Kong, being a common-law jurisdiction, and to argue that Grice’s Cooperative Principle can be usefully adopted to examine jury instructions in order to shed some light on the drafting of jury instructions. The study argues that the principle of rationality, a deeper-level of observance of Gricean maxims, which underlies the Cooperative Principle, has interpretative force on jury instructions in the case of non-observance of conversational maxims, and that, in the court judgments examined, non-observance of the fundamental communicative principle usually constitutes a good ground for appeal, although the opposite is also true. It therefore provides a pertinent demonstration of the differences of the operation of Gricean maxims in lay and legal contexts.
ISSN: 1748-8885
DOI: 10.1558/ijsll.v22i1.15400
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
Checked on Mar 26, 2017

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.