Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/1198
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorChau, KW-
dc.creatorWu, CL-
dc.creatorLi, YS-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:22:39Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:22:39Z-
dc.identifier.issn1084-0699-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/1198-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)en_US
dc.rightsJournal of Hydrologic Engineering © 2005 ASCE. The published version in ASCE's Engineering Database is located at: http://cedb.asce.org/cgi/WWWdisplay.cgi?0529091.en_US
dc.subjectFloodsen_US
dc.subjectForecastingen_US
dc.subjectModelsen_US
dc.subjectNeural networksen_US
dc.subjectAlgorithmsen_US
dc.subjectFuzzy setsen_US
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.subjectRiversen_US
dc.titleComparison of several flood forecasting models in Yangtze Riveren_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: K. W. Chauen_US
dc.identifier.spage485-
dc.identifier.epage491-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:6(485)-
dcterms.abstractIn a flood-prone region, quick and accurate flood forecasting is imperative. It can extend the lead time for issuing disaster warnings and allow sufficient time for habitants in hazardous areas to take appropriate action, such as evacuation. In this paper, two hybrid models based on recent artificial intelligence technology, namely, the genetic algorithm-based artificial neural network (ANN-GA) and the adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), are employed for flood forecasting in a channel reach of the Yangtze River in China. An empirical linear regression model is used as the benchmark for comparison of their performances. Water levels at a downstream station, Han-Kou, are forecasted by using known water levels at the upstream station, Luo-Shan. When cautious treatment is made to avoid overfitting, both hybrid algorithms produce better accuracy in performance than the linear regression model. The ANFIS model is found to be optimal, but it entails a large number of parameters. The performance of the ANN-GA model is also good, yet it requires longer computation time and additional modeling parameters.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of hydrologic engineering, ASCE, 2005, v. 10, no. 6, p. 485-491-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of hydrologic engineering-
dcterms.issued2005-11-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000232757100006-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-27544472438-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr29691-
dc.description.ros2005-2006 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JHydro.pdfPre-published version281.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

230
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

Downloads

804
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

295
Last Week
1
Last month
3
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

267
Last Week
0
Last month
4
Citations as of Apr 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.