Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/1139
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorZhao, MY-
dc.creatorCheng, C-
dc.creatorChau, KW-
dc.creatorLi, G-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:22:48Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:22:48Z-
dc.identifier.issn0957-4352 (print)-
dc.identifier.issn1741-5101 (online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/1139-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInderscienceen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2006 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. The journal web page at: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=9.en_US
dc.subjectMultiple criteria data envelopment analysisen_US
dc.subjectQualitative methoden_US
dc.subjectEnvironment impact assessmenten_US
dc.titleMultiple criteria data envelopment analysis for full ranking units associated to environment impact assessmenten_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: Chun-Tian Chengen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor Gang LI, Department of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian.en_US
dc.identifier.spage448-
dc.identifier.epage464-
dc.identifier.volume28-
dc.identifier.issue3/4-
dc.identifier.doi10.1504/IJEP.2006.011222-
dcterms.abstractThe importance of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) of large development projects is increasingly underlined. Usually, EIA involves a lot of qualitative and quantitative criteria. Data envelopment analysis (DEA), an effective method that is used to rank and select the best alternative from a set of alternatives, is not tailored to address qualitative criteria, thus rendering the application to multiple criteria problems not amenable. This paper presents a new methodology of multiple criteria data envelopment analysis (MCDEA), which can address both qualitative and quantitative criteria. MCDEA is divided into two stages for fully ranking units and each unit has multiple inputs and outputs. In the first stage, a qualitative method is applied to compare the qualitative performance of alternatives. Then, MCDEA is used to rank the alternatives by considering the relative membership degree of qualitative factors as one of the quantitative data. A case study on the selection of dam location illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed methodology.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of environment and pollution, 2006, v. 28, no. 3/4, p. 448-464-
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of environment and pollution-
dcterms.issued2006-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000243072200016-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33845462467-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr31554-
dc.description.ros2006-2007 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJEP9.pdfPre-published version313.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

397
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

967
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

125
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

120
Last Week
0
Last month
12
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.