Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/10761
Title: Reliability and repeatability of the Pentacam on corneal curvatures
Authors: Chen, D
Lam, AKC 
Keywords: Corneal curvature
Pentacam
Reliability
Repeatability
Issue Date: 2009
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Source: Clinical and experimental optometry, 2009, v. 92, no. 2, p. 110-118 How to cite?
Journal: Clinical and experimental optometry 
Abstract: Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the intra-observer reliability and inter-session repeatability of the Pentacam system (Oculus, Inc.) on the simulated keratometry readings (Sim K) and peripheral corneal curvatures (PCC) at both the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces. Methods: One eye was randomly selected from each of the 39 normal subjects from the School of Optometry at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. In the first session, three readings were taken for reliability analysis. Measurements were repeated in a second session scheduled one to two weeks later for repeatability analysis. Two approaches were used, comparing the first reading between the two sessions and comparing the average from three readings between the two sessions. Both the anterior and posterior Sim K and PCC were calculated from the tangential and axial maps. The inter-session repeatability was reported as the coefficient of repeatability (COR = ± 1.96 × standard deviation of differences). Relative repeatability (RR) was a percentage of the ratio of COR to the mean. Results: All parameters showed good intra-observer reliability (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.925; intra-class correlation coefficient, ICC ≥ 0.804), except for the posterior power vector J45 (= 0.896; ICC = 0.742) and tangential PCC at the superior region (= 0.891; ICC = 0.732). The inter-session repeatability on anterior Sim K (COR ≤ ±0.21 D; RR ≤ 0.48 per cent) and posterior Sim K (COR ≤ ±0.09 D; RR ≤ 1.39 per cent) was good. Axial PCC showed better repeatability than the tangential PCC. The COR from using the first approach for all the posterior PCC was within 0.23 D, while the COR reduced to within 0.16 D from using the second approach. Conclusions: The Pentacam showed good intra-observer reliability on Sim K and PCC measurements. Averaging three readings from one visit could improve repeatability between visits. Australia.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/10761
ISSN: 0816-4622
EISSN: 1444-0938
DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2008.00336.x
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

50
Last Week
0
Last month
2
Citations as of Aug 20, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

45
Last Week
0
Last month
2
Citations as of Aug 20, 2017

Page view(s)

32
Last Week
1
Last month
Checked on Aug 21, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.