Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: From emic to etic : exxporting indigenous constructs
Authors: Chen, SX 
Issue Date: 2010
Source: Personality and social psychology compass, 2010, v. 4, no. 6, p. 364-378 How to cite?
Journal: Personality and social psychology compass 
Abstract: The study of culture differs by methodology. This article distinguishes etic (global) and emic (focal) approaches to cross-cultural research, and uses empirical studies in personality and social psychology as examples to illustrate the pros and cons of these two approaches and examine their relationships. Then, the article reviews origins and trends of research on several culturally derived constructs, including face, harmony, filial piety, and modesty. The import and export processes of pan-cultural and indigenous constructs reveal that generalization and indigenization are interrelated, complementary. It is suggested that cultural similarities and differences be better conceptualized as malleable and dynamic, and that etic and emic approaches can be integrated to form a unified system, balancing universality and distinctiveness.
ISSN: 1751-9004(online)
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00268.x
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Aug 12, 2018

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.