Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/10178
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Services Engineering-
dc.creatorLee, WL-
dc.creatorYik, FWH-
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-30T06:31:29Z-
dc.date.available2015-03-30T06:31:29Z-
dc.identifier.issn0360-1285-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/10178-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltden_US
dc.subjectBuildingsen_US
dc.subjectEconomic analysisen_US
dc.subjectEnergy policy mixen_US
dc.titleRegulatory and voluntary approaches for enhancing building energy efficiencyen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage477-
dc.identifier.epage499-
dc.identifier.volume30-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pecs.2004.03.002-
dcterms.abstractBuildings are the dominant energy consumers in modern cities but their consumption can be largely cut back through improving efficiency, which is an effective means to lessen greenhouse gas emissions and slow down depletion of non-renewable energy resources. However, the potential energy cost saving alone is hardly a sufficient incentive to investing into improvement measures, unless the cost of using energy soars. People's attitude will change with increasing concerns about the environment and sustainable development but the results remain insignificant. Surely, more effective means are needed to induce or compel greater efforts, especially to the signatories to the Kyoto Protocol. Whilst regulatory control is widely used, many believe that encouraging voluntary commitments is more cost effective in dealing with environmental problems. More researchers now favor the adoption of a well-articulated policy mix involving both regulatory and voluntary instruments. The paper describes a comprehensive literature review about regulatory and voluntary policy instruments related to building energy efficiency. Particular attention is given to the cost-effectiveness of these instruments, as reflected by the implementation experience of several countries, and a qualitative evaluation. The possibility and benefits of harmonizing governmental and private-sector schemes are discussed.-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationProgress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2004, v. 30, no. 5, p. 477-499-
dcterms.isPartOfProgress in Energy and Combustion Science-
dcterms.issued2004-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000223436900001-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-3342979762-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr20488-
dc.description.ros2003-2004 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

99
Last Week
1
Last month
0
Citations as of Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

84
Last Week
0
Last month
1
Citations as of Oct 20, 2020

Page view(s)

120
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Oct 27, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.